okay so i just read this article about racism and this study they recently did found that people predict they would be outraged in certain situations in which they witnessed racism. in reality, they actually would not be outraged. they're levels of distress were normal and they did nothing to oppose or confront the racist person in the experiment.

interesting. what does this say? what i see most clearly in this is that people have low low low insight and high high high ideas of themselves.

anyway - i just did a session outside and now my freshly, aussie-washed hair smells like smokey ass.

lovely day though.

i was talking to my roomy about this yesterday, that sometimes the things i crave in a relationship is the ability to know the person well and immediately have specific things to tell them about my day or life because i know how much they would appreciate, enjoy, or despise the stories . . . when you begin a relationship, u don't have that . . and then there are times when i become bored with generalized details of my life in fear that too many random specifics may be too weird and no specifics though would defeat the purpose of getting to know the real me. . . who is showered with specificities of events and their lessons as opposed to the huge and grand events of life . .

its not that brilliant but i wonder if putting my words out there gives anyone the right to take them. by the powers vested in me by buddha and ganesh, i hereby copyright all contents in this blog to ME, t-money, tanville, tanny mitai, tons of fun, tanvi patel (no not the one from chicago whose friends and colleagues constantly email me . . ) the one from texas who is far less decorated

t-$
out